am delighted to be here during the 400
hundredth anniversary of the foundation of Quebec. You are celebrating
all that rich history, with the immense contribution that the
Canadians have made to the Church throughout the world. In so
many places that I have been, I have discovered churches founded
by missionaries from Brittany and Canada. I do not know if I
will still be welcome when I tell you that I had an ancestor
who was part of your history. There is a famous painting of the
death of General Wolf, after the capture of Quebec by the British,
and the man holding the British flag is my ancestor!
“Called to be Signs of Hope”
During this meeting you will also be thinking
of the future. This is not an easy time for religious life in
most continents.
In the last year I have given lectures to conferences of religious
in Asia, Latin America, Africa, North America and Europe, and
nearly everywhere the same question is put: Does religious
life have a future? This is true of Canada as well. Many congregations
face the possibility of extinction. But the very name Quebec
must give us courage. It comes from the Algonquin word meaning
narrow passage or strait. It originally referred to the narrowing
of the river at Cape Diamond.
At this moment we are passing
through a narrow straight, between the open expanses of the
river above and the sea below. I believe
that our vocation as religious is more important than ever
before. We are called to be signs of hope for humanity. We
religious
may be passing through a moment in which we have doubts about
our own future, but the whole of humanity is facing a severe
crisis of hope. I do not mean that everyone is necessarily
unhappy, though there is an epidemic of suicides among the
young. I mean
that our contemporaries do not have a story to tell of the
future that offers hope.
When I was young in the late sixties,
we were confident that humanity was moving towards a wonderful
future, in which
war and poverty would be finished. Everything seemed possible.
We believed in progress. The Beatles were enchanting the
world.
Even English cooking was improving! Now, at the beginning
of this new millennium, we are faced with the ecological
crisis,
the spread of religious fundamentalism, terrorism, the
epidemic of Aids, a growing gap between the rich and the poor.
Many
states
in Africa are on the brink of collapse. What stories do
the young have to give them hope? There is the story of an approaching
ecological disaster, and the story of the war on terrorism.
Neither
of them promise a future for the young. In so many countries,
such as Canada, Spain and Italy, there is a disastrous
drop
in the birth rate. People fear to bring children into a
world without
a future.
In this situation, religious life is called
to be a sign of hope. For us religious, this is not by having
babies,
you will
be glad
to know! Our odd life with its vows is a sign of hope
for humanity. We are this because we have a vocation. This
vocation calls
us into community and sends us out on mission. Our vocation
is wonderful
not because we are wonderful but because it is a sign
of our marvelous hope for the whole of humanity. So I will
look at
three ways in which religious life is a sign of hope:
first of all
because of our profession; secondly by our life in community,
and then briefly by our mission.
Responding to God’s
Call
Let us begin with the concept of vocation.
I was drawn to the Dominicans because I loved the mission of
the
Order and
I enjoyed
the brethren. But ultimately that was not enough. I
became a Dominican because I believed that this was my vocation.
I was
called by God to walk in this Dominican way.
But that
is an expression of a deeper truth, which is that every human
being is called by God. God calls
us
into existence
and
he calls us to find our happiness in him. So, to
be a religious is to embody a fundamental and hopeful
conviction
about
humanity. We are on our way to God. We may have no
idea of the future
of humanity, of what disasters and violence lie ahead,
of whether we shall be blown up by bombs or drowned
by the rising
sea
or
fried by global warming, but God is calling all of
creation to himself.
“ Here I Am”
Everything exists because God calls it into
existence. God says let there be light, and it sprang into being.
There is a lovely
passage in the prophet Baruch: “The stars shone
in their watches and were glad; he called them and
they said, “Here
we are!” They shone with gladness for him who
made them.” (Baruch
3.34). The existence of a star is not just a bald
scientific fact. Stars joyful say Yes to the God.
The existence of everything
is a Yes to God.
What is odd about human beings is
that we do not just say “Yes” by
existing. We say Yes to God with our words. God speaks
a word to us, and we reply with our words. It is
for this that we were
created, to answer God’s word with our words.
This human vocation is summed up in a beautiful Hebrew
word, Hineni. It
means, “Here I am.” When God calls from
the burning bush, Moses replies, “Hineni,” “Here
I am,” When
God calls Abraham to sacrifice Isaac, then Abraham
replies “Hineni,” “Here
I am.” When Isaiah hears a voice saying, “Whom
shall I send?” he replies, “Here I am.
Send me.” But
when God calls Adam in the garden, he does not say “here
I am,” but he hides in the bushes.
We express
that truth of that human vocation when we make profession
as religious. We place ourselves
in
the hands
of our brothers
or sisters, and we say our definitive Yes. Here I
am. This is more than the acceptance of obedience
to a
rule. It
is more than
the commitment to a way of life. It is an explicit
sign of what it means to be a human being.
Calling
Each Other
We do not just say Yes at profession. We go
on being called by our brothers and sisters for the whole
of our lives,
when we
are called to have a role in the community, to
be bursar or novice mistress or prioress. We call each
other.
Our obedience is mutual.
And this is more than the efficient organization
of the mission of the Order. It expresses our on-going
assent
to God, “Hineni,” Here
I am!
We should call each other to courage and freedom,
to do things that we would not have dared to do.
Our brothers
and sisters
should call us beyond fear, when we feel paralyzed
and stuck.
One day I was walking with some of the brethren
in Scotland. We came to a cliff where the path
disappeared.
You had
to place your feet in a slit and work your way
along. It was
all rather
frightening, suspended above the waves of the sea
and the rocks. When we got to the end, we realized
that
one brother,
Gareth,
was not there. We had not realized that he suffered
from vertigo. So one of us had to go to find him,
paralyzed with fear. We
had to say “Gareth, put your hand here. You can move over a
meter. Now stretch the other foot.” Until
finally he made his way to safety. All of this
journey we call each other, and
that is the voice of God, calling each of us to
freedom and courage, not knowing what is around
the corner. It is risky. We have to
learn to trust the voice that calls.
I am reminded of the man who was driving along
the top of a cliff wondering whether God existed
or not.
In fact
he
was
so distracted
that he drove over the cliff and fell out of the
car. As he was falling he clung to the branch of
a tree.
Suddenly the
question
of faith became urgent and so he shouted out, “Is there
anyone there?” Finally a voice replied, “Yes, I am
here. Trust me. Let go of the branch and fall, and I will catch
you.” So he thought for a while and then he cried out again, “Is
there anyone else there?”
“Living the Uncertainty with
Joy”
The
central Christian sign of hope is the Last Supper. Jesus placed
himself in the hands of these fragile disciples.
God dared to be vulnerable and to give himself
to people who
would betray
him, deny him and run away. In religious life,
we take the same risk. We place ourselves in the hands
of fragile
brothers
and
sisters, and we do not know what they will do
with us. We even place ourselves in the hands of people not
yet
born, who will
one day be our brothers and sisters. My Prior
in Oxford was
born five years after I joined the Order! Even
today, after more than
forty years as a Dominican, I do not know what
they will
ask of me.
We are called to live this uncertainty
with joy. The seed of my vocation as a religious was probably
the
unexpected joy
of a Benedictine great uncle of mine. He had
been mutilated in the
First World War. He has lost an eye and most
of his fingers, but he was filled with happiness,
provided
that my mother
remembered to give him his nightcap of whisky
before
bed!
And I guessed,
even as a child, that the origin of this joy
was God. The Abbot Primate of the Benedictines,
Notker
Wolf,
invited some Japanese
Buddhist and Shintuist monks to come and stay
for two weeks
in the monastery of St. Ottilien, Bavaria.
When they were asked what struck them they replied, “The
joy.” “Why
are Catholic monks such joyful people?”
This joy is a sign of hope for those who see
no future ahead of them. For the unemployed,
for students
who
fail their
exams, for couples whose marriage is going
through a difficult time,
for those faced with war, then our joy faced
with uncertainty should be a sign of hope that
every
human life is on
the way to God, whatever difficulties there
may be on the way.
So to be a religious is not to know the story
of our lives. Most people have careers, and
these may structure
their
stories. They
move up the ladder of promotion. The soldier
becomes
a sergeant, the captain dreams of becoming
a general, the
school teacher
a head teacher. But we do not have careers.
Whatever role one may hold in the Order, one
can never
be more than one
of the
brethren or sisters. In a way, it does not
matter what one does. When people ask me what
I do now,
then I
can reply
that I am
doing what we all do, which is to be a brother.
Of course sometimes we may feel that our brethren
do not recognize who we are, and that we are
called to
do things
that are a
waste of time. Maybe our talents are not recognized.
Then of course,
we must speak. We are not passive doormats.
We cannot accept an infantile obedience that
treats
us as if
we were just
pawns to be disposed of on the superior’s
chessboard, filling gaps. So there must be
dialogue and mutual attentiveness. But
it is part of our religious vocation, as a
sign of hope, that even if we are mistreated
and unappreciated, we still have the
joy of those whose lives are on their way to
God. When his Carmelite brethren imprisoned
St John of the Cross, he still managed to
sing.
I recently received a letter from a friend
of mine, an Anglican religious. He has an illness
which
is slowly leading to his
complete paralysis. This great teacher is loosing
his ability to talk.
And he quoted to me the words of that great
man,
Dag Hammarskjold, “For
all that has been...Thank you. For all that
will be...Yes.” That
is the witness of religious life.
Being Witnesses
to Hope
It is true that religious life is, in
many places, living through a time of crisis, for
example
in Canada. And
many individual
religious live through crisis too. We may
worry about the future of our Province or monastery.
We may feel
that our
own lives
are rapidly going nowhere. But we can only
be a sign of hope for a generation that is
living
through
a
crisis if
we are
able to confront our crises with joy and
serenity. It can be part
of our vocation as religious to confront
crises in our vocation as moments of grace and new
life.
In every Eucharist we remember the crisis
of Maundy Thursday night. Jesus could have
run
away from
that crisis, but
he did not. He embraced it and made it fruitful.
So, if we encounter
a moment when we can see no way ahead, and
when we may feel tempted to pack and go,
then this
is precisely
the
moment
when
our religious
lives may be about to ripen and mature. Like
Jesus at the Last Supper, this is the moment
to embrace
what is
happening,
and
trust that it will bear fruit. That is part
of how our vocation witnesses to hope.
These crises may even include facing of the
death of our own communities. For many monasteries
in Western Europe,
there
is no apparent future. Do we dare face even
that
with
joy? When
I was Provincial, I went to visit a monastery
which was nearing the end of its life, called
Carisbroke.
There
were just four
nuns left, three of them old. One of the
nuns said to me, “Timothy,
but God cannot let Carisbroke die, can he?” And the previous
Provincial, who was standing beside me, said, “He let his
Son die, didn’t he?” How can
we be witnesses to death and Resurrection
if we fear to face the death of our own community?
Giving our life until death
A couple of years ago there was a Congress
in Rome about religious life, and many people
questioned
whether commitment
until death
was still a necessary part of religious life.
I
am all in favor of opening our communities
to all sorts
of friends,
associates
and collaborators but I would still argue
that at the centre of religious life, there
must
be the courageous
gesture
of
giving our lives until death, usque ad mortem.
It is
an extravagant gesture that speaks of our
hope that every human life in
its totality, up to and including death,
is a path towards the
God
who calls.
Once an elderly friar, facing death, told
me that he was about to fulfill a great ambition,
to die
a Dominican.
At the time
I did not think that this was much of an
ambition,
but it is one that I have come to treasure.
He made a gift
of his
life
and, despite difficulties on the way, he
did not take it
back. He was a sign of hope for the young.
I have been told a thousand times that the
young cannot be expected to make that definitive
commitment,
until
death. It is true that
the young live in a world of short term commitments,
whether at work or in the home. The average
American has eleven
different
jobs in a working life. Marriages often do
not endure. And so it is asserted that we
cannot expect the young
to make
permanent profession. I remember one young
French
friar who, on the eve,
of his solemn profession was asked if he
was giving himself totally,
and without reserve and forever to the Order.
And he is reported to have replied: “I give myself completely and without
reserve now. But who knows who I shall be in ten years time?”
But
it is precisely because we live in a culture
of short-term commitments that profession
until
death is a beautiful
sign of hope. It speaks of the long term
story in which
every
human being
is summoned to God. It is an extravagant
gesture, but we must ask the young to make
brave and
crazy gestures,
and
believe
that they can, with God’s grace, live
them out. Recently four young men made solemn
profession for my English Province. They
are all bright, energetic and with University
degrees. Every one of them could have flourished
in the world, have had happily
married lives and earned lots of money. Some
young women said, “What
a waste! They could have been happily married...
perhaps to me.” I
am not sure that anyone said that when I
made profession, unfortunately! For them
to give themselves to the Order until death
speaks of
our hope for every human being.
Called into
Community
So to have a vocation is to say something
about what it means to be human. But we are
not just
called.
We are called
into
community and sent on mission. Each of these
movements, into community
and out in mission, expresses a truth about
our hope for the Kingdom.
First of all, the vocation to community:
This is a sign that God calls all of humanity
into
the
Kingdom, in which
all
divisions and violence will be over. The
human vocation is for that peace
when, as Isaiah says, the nations “shall beat their swords
into ploughshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation
shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn
war any more.” (2.4). Jesus is the one in whom the wall
of enmity has been broken down. Our communities should be a sign
of the Risen Lord who said the apostles, “Peace be with
you.”
When I ask young people why they
wish to become Dominicans, then it is often
because
they want
community. In
our fractured world,
many people live alone. We are moving from
rural communities to big cities like Vancouver
and
Montreal. Last year,
for the first time in human history, more
than half of all
human beings
now live in cities. People know their neighbors.
We are invisible in the streets. Families
have become smaller.
Many people
have no brothers or sisters. God said to
Adam that it is not good
for us to live alone, but the modern world
is filled with lonely people longing for
community.
But because our society is so filled with
people who are alone, then community life
can be difficult.
We
are not
used to sharing
our lives with many other people. I grew
up in a large family, with six children,
my parents
and grandmother,
and other
people too. I learned that my mother loved
me
even when she seemed
to forget my name! When I joined the novitiate,
then it was not
much of a change from home. But even I sometimes
find
it hard to live in community. So it is the
desire for community
that
attracts many to religious life and the difficulty
of community that means that some do not
stay.
“Community Life, a sign of the
Kingdom”
But it is both the joy and the pain of community
life that speaks of the Kingdom. I have already spoken
of the joy which is an
intrinsic part of our vocation. But it is
also part of our witness to the Kingdom that we live with
people who are unlike
us, who
have different theologies, different politics,
who
like
different food and speak different languages.
Life with them may be
sometimes wonderful but also hard. With them
we may be tempted to beat
our pruning sticks into swords rather than
the other way around. But our common life is a sign of
the
Kingdom precisely
because
of our differences. A community of like-minded
people
is not a sign of the Kingdom. It is just a sign
of
itself.
I lived in France for a year as a Dominican
student. It was wonderful and terrible. One day I
was sitting with
four very
clever French
Dominicans, who seem to take no notice of
anything that I said. Finally I stopped the conversation
and said, “Now I know
why Descartes was French. Because in France, if you do not prove
your own existence, then there is no reason to believe that you
exist!” Yet it was living with these
French Dominicans, whom I came to love, that
I discovered how we are only signs
of the Kingdom if we endure and enjoy difference.
The most powerful sign of this that I have
ever seen has been with my brother Yvon,
on visits
to Rwanda
and Burundi
during
the difficult years. Yvon knows vastly more
than I how difficult that was. It is hard
to sit at
table and in
the church with
people whose brothers have murdered your
brothers and
sisters. But that
pain is also an expression of hope.
The temptation of our society is to search
for community only with the like-minded,
people who
share our views,
our prejudices
and our blood. Conservatives associate with
conservatives, and progressives with progressives.
Old people
are sent to old people’s
homes, teenagers spend their time with teenagers, and so on.
Mrs. Thatcher used to ask of people, “Is he one of us?” We
should refuse that temptation. Instead of being homogenous, like
a block of vanilla ice cream, we should be like good casserole,
in which it is the difference tastes that gives the savor.
“Reaching out in Friendship beyond
the Divisions”
In many countries the Church is profoundly
polarized between so-called conservatives and progressives.
There is a real enmity and anger within our Church at those
on “the other side.” Our
prophetic role is to reach out in friendship
beyond the divisions. The opposition of left and right,
traditionalist and progressive,
derive from the Eighteenth Century Enlightenment
and are alien to Catholicism. We are all necessarily both
conservative, looking
back to the gospels and tradition, and progressive,
looking forward to the Kingdom. It is true that some of
us have a more “conservative” or “progressive” temperament,
but for us there can be no fundamental and
ultimate opposition between tradition and
transformation. And so in our communities
we must refuse to let ourselves be divided
into camps.
One of the challenges is that
of reaching across generations. In my community in Oxford,
we
encompass at least four
generations. There is one old brother who
was formed in the classic
tradition of before the Council. There are
four or five of my generation,
who lived in the exhilarating and tumultuous
years after the Council. There is a larger
group of people
who come
from what
is sometimes called the “John Paul
II generation,” who
reacted against some of what they thought
of as the wild liberalism of my generation.
And now there is “Generation Y,” in
their mid and late twenties, which is different
again.
A community will only thrive if it dares
to welcome the young, to challenge them and
to
be challenged
by them,
knowing that
they will never be like us. Many congregations
are dying because they do not accept that
the young must
be different
from us.
When I was a young friar, we had a wonderful
old Dominican called Gervase: A great scholar,
he often
argued against
the crazy ideas
of the young and resisted our innovations,
but when it came to the vote, he always voted
in
favor of
the young,
because
without
the young there is no future.
Our ability
to endure difference, and come to enjoy it, is also part of
our witness
to the
Church.
The Second
Vatican Council
put stress on the local Church, gathered
around the Bishop. This is wonderful and
beautiful.
But the
hierarchical Church also
needs us religious, with our different
charisms and vocations.
It needs contemplatives who resist the
busyness of our world,
and religious who work with the poor and
excluded, or have an intellectual apostolate.
We need
the beautiful diversity
of religious
spiritualities, Franciscan, Jesuit, Dominican,
Carmelite and so on.
The temptation of the
hierarchical Church is towards sameness. Unity tends to become
the
imposition of uniformity. But,
we have seen, a community of the same
is not a
good sign of the
Kingdom.
So religious communities help the Church
to point to the Kingdom by our eccentricity.
This
has
been so ever
since
the desert
fathers and mothers began their strange
way of life more than one thousand
six hundred years ago. We are like the
jesters at the Royal Courts in the past,
who had
the liberty to speak
openly
and even to
tease the King! Without this freedom,
the Church dies.
Sent on Mission
We are not just called into
community, we are also sent on mission. This also
speaks
of the
Kingdom
and of our
hope
for humanity.
Jesus was sent to us by the Father.
At the end of each Mass we too are sent.
It is a
sign of
God’s love that forgets no
one and will gather all of humanity
into the Kingdom.
I was deeply touched
by a conversation with a brother, called
Pedro, in the
Amazon. He
was
a well-educated
man who could
have done all sorts of things. Instead
he accepted to be assigned to minister
to this
remote area
of jungle. Most
of his time
was
spent in walking and in his canoe,
visiting small communities of indigenous
people
whom the world
has never known.
In a sense Pedro, in giving his lives
to these people, was
disappearing,
sharing their invisibility. But he
rejoiced in it because it
was his vocation. It was a sign that
these people, who
may not have been noticed by us, had
not been forgotten by God.
In your
care for the excluded, you are a sign
of God’s unfailing
memory of every human person.
Daring
to Send Each Other Out
It is significant
that Pedro did not just choose to go. He was sent. It
is being
sent that makes
it a sign
of
God’s care
rather than just a career option.
Do we dare to send and be sent ourselves?
Many religious congregations have
lost
the nerve.
At a meeting in the United States,
one sister told me that she had been
a religious for twenty years but
that no one had ever
asked her to do anything. She can
choose whatever mission she wishes.
She says,
like Isaiah, “here I am, send
me,” but
no one does.
Why are some congregations
afraid to send anyone? There are
many reasons
for this.
Some pre-conciliar
superiors
were
so tyrannical
and arbitrary that they so wounded
religious, that today the leadership
hesitates to
send anyone. After the abuse
of the
vow of obedience, we do not fear
to
send. Another is the collapse of
shared missions
in many
congregations, which
no longer run
hospitals and schools, and so have
looked to the
parishes
for ministry and become absorbed
into the structures of the local
church. So there is no mission on
which to send people.
But I believe that if religious life
is to flourish, we rediscover the
nerve to
send
each other, otherwise
we shall
fail to
be a sign of God’s memory. I would never have joined the Dominicans
if I had been told that I could just do what I wanted. And young
people will not come today unless they know that we will ask
them to do crazy things, which may appear to be beyond their
abilities.
Jesus was sent to be the embodiment
of the Father’s face.
He recognized people. The encounter
with Jesus is always meeting someone
who first recognizes us. He recognizes
Nathaniel and
so Nathaniel can recognize him. He
recognizes Zacchaeus up the fig tree.
He recognizes Mary Magdalene in the
garden, who can
then recognize him. “Mary”; “Rabboni.” Once
in Lima I came across a photo of
a street kid. And under it said, “Saben
que existo, pero no me ven,” (they
know that I exist but they do not
see me.) People know that he exists
as a problem,
as a threat, but they do not see
him! Religious are sent to the most
forgotten places, to be a sign of
the God who forgets no
one and who recognizes their faces.
“Let Us Be Confident”
To conclude: In this time when humanity is
suffering from a crisis of hope, then religious
life may be one small sign of
the Kingdom.
We are sign first of all by virtue
of our vocation. We make visible the vocation of all humanity,
called to the Kingdom.
We are sign
of the Kingdom by being called into
community,
and daring
to live with those who are unlike
us. Prophetically
we refuse the security of making our home
with the
like-minded. And
we
are
a sign in being called out of community,
sent on mission, as a sign of God’s boundless and unforgetting love. It is
worth being such a sign. The Church and humanity need that sign
more than ever. So let us be confident. We are not finished!